Product Code Database
The Guhilas of Medapata colloquially known as Guhilas of Mewar were a Suryavanshi Rajput dynasty that ruled the Kingdom of Mewar (Medapata, modern Mewar) region in present-day Rajasthan state of India. The Guhila kings initially ruled as Gurjara-Pratihara feudatories between the end of 8th and 9th centuries and later were independent in period of the early 10th century and allied themselves with the Rashtrakutas. Their capitals included Nagahrada (Nagda) and Aghata (Ahar). For this reason, they are also known as the Nagda-Ahar branch of the Gahlot.
The Guhilas assumed sovereignty after the decline of the Pratiharas in the 10th century under Rawal Bharttripatta II and Rawal Allata. During the 10th-13th centuries, they were involved in military conflicts with several of their neighbours, including the Kingdom of Malwa, the Kingdom of Sambhar, the Delhi Sultanate, the , and the Kingdom of Gujarat. In the late 11th century, the Paramara king Bhoja interfered in the Guhila throne possibly deposing a ruler and placing some other ruler of the branch.
In the mid-12th century, the dynasty divided into two branches. The senior branch (whose rulers are called Rawal in the later medieval literature) ruled from Chitrakuta (modern Chittor Fort), and ended with Ratnasimha's defeat against the Delhi Sultanate at the 1303 Siege of Chittorgarh. The junior branch rose from the village of Sisoda with the title Rana and established the Sisodia Dynasty Rajput dynasty.
By the 10th century, the Guhilas of Nagda-Ahar were the only among the three dynasties to have survived. By this time, their political status had increased, and the Guhila kings had assumed high royal titles such as Maharajadhiraja. During this period, the dynasty started claiming a prestigious origin, stating that its founder Guhila was a kshatriya(Rajput) who was bought up in a Nagda Brahmin household and had migrated from Anandapura (present-day Vadnagar in Gujarat). The 977 CE Atpur inscription of Shaktikumara lists 20 Guhila kings in an unbroken line of succession, starting with Guhadatta and ending with Shaktikumara.
By the 13th century, having consolidated their rule over the Medapata (Mewar) region Their post-13th century records and the subsequent bardic legends name the dynasty's founder as Bappa Rawal, who is not mentioned in the Atpur inscription. These accounts state that Bappa Rawal consolidated his rule with the blessings of the Pashupata sage Haritarashi. Different historians identify Bappa Rawal with different kings mentioned in the Atpur inscription, including Kalabhoja, Shiladitya, and Khummana. R. C. Majumdar theorizes that Bappa achieved a highly significant military success, because of which he gained reputation as the dynasty's founder.
According to the 1274 CE Chittor inscription and the 1285 CE Achaleshwar (Mount Abu) inscription of Vedasharma, Bappa Rawal "changed his priestly splendour for regal lustre". Based on this, scholars such as D. R. Bhandarkar theorized that the Guhilas were originally Brahmins. G. H. Ojha, however, believed that the statement in Vedasharma's inscription is a misinterpretation of the earlier Atpur inscription. The Atpur inscription describes Guhadatta as a "Mahideva", which according to historian R. V. Somani, can be translated as either "king" or "Brahmin".
The 1274 CE Chittor inscription compares the Guhila ruler Bharttripatta with Rama, describing both of them as "Brahma-Kshatras". Based on the identification of Rama with Parashurama, scholars such as D. C. Sircar theorized that the progenitor of the dynasty had a Brahmin parent and a Kshatriya parent. However, Somani dismisses this theory, arguing that Rama here refers to Ramachandra, from whose Solar dynasty (or Suryavansh) the later Guhilas claimed descent.
The later bardic chronicles mention a fabricated genealogy, claiming that the dynasty's founder Guhaditya was a son of Shiladitya, the Maitraka ruler of Vallabhi. This claim is not supported by historical evidence.
According to the 977 CE Atpur inscription and the 1083 CE Kadmal inscription, Guhadatta was succeeded by Bhoja, who commissioned the construction of a tank at Eklingji. The 1285 CE Achaleshwar inscription describes him as a devotee of Vishnu. Bhoja was succeeded by Mahendra and Nagaditya. The bardic legends state that Nagaditya was killed in a battle with the Bhils.
Nagaditya's successor Shiladitya raised the political status of the family significantly, as suggested by his 646 CE Samoli inscription, as well as the inscriptions of his successors, including the 1274 CE Chittor inscription and the 1285 CE Abu inscription. R. V. Somani theorizes that the copper and zinc mines at Zawar were excavated during his reign, which greatly increased the economic prosperity of the kingdom. The 16th century Buddhist writer Taranatha mentions a reputed artist named Shringadhara, who was patronized by the king Shila of Maru country. Somani identifies this king as the Guhila king Shiladitya, although some other historians have identified him as Harshavardhana or the Maitraka king Shiladitya.
Shiladitya was succeeded by Aparajita, who is attested by the 661 CE Kunda inscription. This epigraph records the construction of a Vishnu temple by Yashomati, the wife of Aparajita's commander Varaha. According to the bardic chronicles, Aparajita was also killed in a battle with the Bhils. His son Mahendra succeeded him.
Mahendra was succeeded by Kalabhoja, who has been identified as Bappa Rawal by several historians including G. H. Ojha. Kalabhoja (Bappa Rawal) known for his majestic victory against Arabs during initial Arab invasion of India. Bappa Rawal defeated Arabs in the banks of River Indus and pushed them out of Present day Baluchistan. Bappa Rawal them marched towards Gahzni and defeated the local ruler Salim and returned to Chitor.
The Guhilas originally acknowledged the suzerainty of the Gurjara-Pratiharas. In the 10th century, Bharttripatta II became an independent ruler, and assumed the title Maharajadhiraja, as attested by a 943 CE inscription. His successor Rawal Allata (reigned c. 950s CE) killed one Devapala, who according to Majumdar, might have been the Gurjara-Pratihara king Devapala. in Nagda, Rajasthan, 10th century CE.]]
In the later half of the 10th century, the Paramara dynasty king Vakpati Munja defeated the elephant forces of the Guhilas, and plundered their capital Ahar. The defeated Guhila ruler (either Naravahana or his son Shaktikumara) took shelter with Dhavala, the Rashtrakuta ruler of Hastikundi. As a result of this victory, the Paramaras gained control of the eastern part of Mewar, including Chittorgarh.
Shaktikumara's son Ambaprasada was defeated and killed by the Chahamana king Vakpatiraja II. Among his successors, Vijayasimha (r.c. 1108–1116) was a son-in-law of the Paramara king Udayaditya and a father-in-law of the Kalachuri king Gayakarna.
Kshemasimha succeeded his father Ranasimha alias Karna. By 1151, Chittor was under the control of the Chaulukya king Kumarapala. Kshemasimha's son Samantasimha appears to have achieved military success against Kumarapala's successor Ajayapala. However, he was defeated by Ajayapala's feudatory Prahladana, the Paramara chief of Mount Abu. The 1231 CE Abu prashasti inscription states that Prahladana defended the Gurjaradesa king (that is, Ajayapala) after Samantasimha had broken the king's power on the battlefield. in Nagda, Rajasthan, 10th century CE.|255x255px]]Shortly later, the Naddula Chahamana king Kirtipala, who was also a Chaulukya feudatory, ousted Samantasimha from Mewar. Kirtipala probably launched this invasion during 1171-1179 CE, with the approval of his Chaulukya overlord. By 1182, Samantasimha's younger brother Kumarasimha regained the control of his ancestral kingdom by appeasing the Chaulukya king Bhima II. After losing his ancestral realm, Samantasimha established new branch of the Guhilas in the area of Vagad. However, he was displaced from Vagad by Bhima II in 1185 CE or thereabouts. He was aided by Sambhar-Ajmer ruler Prithviraja III with whom he fought against the Ghurid Muhammad of Ghor in Second Battle of Tarain.
Kumarasimha was succeeded by Mathanasimha, Padmasimha and Jaitrasimha.
The Guhila records also credit him with military success against the king of Shakambhari. The rulers of Shakambhari had already ended by this time, therefore, this may be a reference to the Chahamanas of Ranthambore. Jaitrasimha is also said to have defeated the Sindhuka army, whose identity is uncertain.
Tejasimha's son Rawal Samarsimha succeeded him sometime during 1267–1273. He defeated Krishnaraja, a ruler of the Paramara branch of Mount Abu. He lost control of Abu soon, when Krishnaraja's son Pratapasimha, supported by the Vaghela dynasty king Sarangadeva, conquered it during 1285–1287. Sometime before 1285, Samarasimha helped Sarangadeva repulse a Turkic peoples (Turkic) invasion of Gujarat (possibly a Delhi Sultanate army during Balban's reign). His Chirwa inscription states that he "like unto the varaha ... in a moment lifted the deeply sunk Gurjaradesa land out of the Turushka sea". Towards the end of the 13th century, when Alauddin Khalji's army invaded Gujarat, Samarasimha saved his kingdom by paying a tribute.
The Rawal branch ended when Ratnasimha was defeated by Alauddin Khalji in the Siege of Chittorgarh (1303). The Rana branch survived in form of the Sisodia Dynasty dynasty which continued to rule Mewar till Independence of India from British control.
The following inscriptions are the major sources of the dynasty's genealogy:
| Called Bappaka in Abu inscription |
| Called Guhadatta in Atpur inscription |
| Called ShKhummāṇa in Kumbhalgarh inscription |
| Called Manttaṭa in Chittor inscription |
| Called Bhartṛibhaṭa in all inscriptions except the Atpur one |
| Called Athasiṃha Chittor inscription |
| Son of Siṃha |
| Called Mahāyika in Abu inscription, Son of Khommāṇa |
| Called Khumāṇa in all inscriptions except the Atpur one, Son of Mahāyaka |
| Son of Khommāṇa (III), Married Mahālakṣmī of Rashtrakuta family |
| Son of Bhartṛipaṭṭa (II), Married Huna princess Hariyādevī |
| Son of Rawal Allata, Married a daughter of Jejaya of Chahamana family. Held religious debates in court between Buddhism, Jainism and Shaivism. |
| Son of Naravāhana |
| Son of Śalivāhana |
| Called Ambāprasāda in Kumbhalgarh inscription, Son of Śaktikumāra. Slain by Chauhan Vakpatiraja II in Battle. |
| The Kumbhalgarh inscription lists Anantavarman (a son of Śaktikumāra) instead |
| Son of Śaktikumāra |
| The Kumbhalgarh inscription lists Yaśovarman (a son of Śaktikumāra) instead |
| According to Kumbhalgarh inscription, his descendants did not rule. Possibly deposed by Bhoja of Paramars. |
| Descendant of Junior branch from Rawal Allata. Possibly placed on throne by Bhoja. |
| Called Haṃsapāla in Kumbhalgarh inscription |
| Son of Vaṃśapāla |
| Son of Vairaṭa. Married Śyāmaladevī (daughter of Paramara dynasty king Udayaditya) forming a matrimonial alliance with the traditional enemy of the house; His daughter Alhaṇadevi married the Kalachuri king Gayakarna. The Kumbhalgarh inscription mentions an unnamed narendra (prince), who is identified with him. |
| Son of Vijayasiṃha. Called Virasiṃha in Kumbhalgarh inscription |
| Called Choḍasiṃha in Sadadi inscription |
| Son of Choḍa (Abu insc.) or Elder brother of Choḍa (Kumbhalgarh insc.) |
| Son of Vikramasiṃha. Called Karṇasiṃha in Ekalinga Purana. Rana Branch descends through his son Rahapa. |
| Son of Raṇasiṃha; his elder brother Mahanasiṃha apparently died before their father Raṇasiṃha |
| Son of Kṣemasiṃha |
| Younger brother of Sāmantasiṃha |
| Called Mahanasiṃha in Kumbhalgarh inscription, Son of Kumārasiṃha |
| Called Raula Jayasiṃha in Kumbhalgarh inscription. Son of Padmasiṃha. His younger son Sīlhaḍa seems to have ruled Vagad. |
| Son of Jaitrasiṃha. The Kumbhalgarh inscription gives his title as Rāula. Married Jayatalladevī |
| Son of Tejasiṃha. Assumed the title Mahārajākula. The Kumbhalgarh inscription gives his title as Rāula. |
| Son of Samarasiṃha. Assumed the title Mahārajākula in Dariba inscription. The Kumbhalgarh inscription gives his title as Rāula. |
The 1439 Sadadi inscription of Kumbhakarna lists the following five rulers as Rawal Samarsimha successors: Bhuvanasiṃha, Jayasiṃha, Lakṣmasiṃha, Ajayasiṃha, and Arisiṃha. These names are followed by that of Hammir Singh and other his Sisodia Dynasty successors. These names are also mentioned in the text Ekalinga Māhātmya (also called Ekalinga Purāṇa). However, these rulers actually belonged to the Rana branch of the family.
The 1460 Kumbhalgarh inscription of Kumbhakarna states that after Ratnasiṃha departed from the battlefield (during the 1303 Siege of Chittor), Lakshmasiṃha of the Rana branch died fighting to defend the fort.
"type": "FeatureCollection",
"features": [
{
"type": "Feature",
"properties": { "marker-symbol": "monument", "title": "Ahar" },
"geometry": { "type": "Point", "coordinates": [73.719444, 24.587778] }
},
{
"type": "Feature",
"properties": { "marker-symbol": "monument", "title": "Nagda" },
"geometry": { "type": "Point", "coordinates": [76.265291, 25.165124] }
},
{
"type": "Feature",
"properties": { "marker-symbol": "monument", "title": "[[Chittor]]" },
"geometry": { "type": "Point", "coordinates": [74.626922, 24.888744] }
},
{
"type": "Feature",
"properties": { "marker-symbol": "monument", "title": "Sisoda" },
"geometry": { "type": "Point", "coordinates": [73.740431, 25.005169] }
}
]
}
Hammir Singh re-established the family's rule over Mewar under the title of Rana.
For Sisodia successors of Hammir Singh, see .
|
|
